News — ANN ARBOR, Mich. –  The discontinuation of a popular asthma medication was linked to a higher rate of children stopping inhaled steroid therapy altogether, a new study suggests.

In January 2024, a manufacturer stopped producing brand name inhaler Flovent, an inhaled steroid commonly prescribed to prevent asthma attacks in children.

Although the manufacturer continued to market with a chemically identical “authorized generic,” some families reportedly had difficulty obtaining this alternative drug because their plan did not cover it or required high out-of-pocket costs.

As a potential result, the new study suggests, children using Flovent were more likely to completely discontinue using inhaled steroids after Flovent was pulled from the market compared to children using other inhaled steroids.

“Our findings suggest the withdrawal of Flovent disrupted inhaled steroid therapy in children, potentially increasing their risk of asthma attacks,” said lead author Kao Ping Chua, M.D., Ph.D., a pediatrician and researcher at University of Michigan Health C.S. Mott Children's Hospital and the Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center.

The Michigan Medicine led findings, based on data between 2021 and 2024, were presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies and simultaneously published in JAMA.

Unintended consequences of rebate cap policies

The withdrawal of Flovent was likely prompted by changes to the amount of rebates manufacturers must pay to Medicaid programs to obtain drug coverage, authors say

Historically, rebates were capped, but the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 eliminated this cap effective January 2024.

For Flovent, the cap elimination would have resulted in rebates exceeding the drug’s sales price because the company had previously raised Flovent’s price rapidly, subjecting them to a rebate that applies when price increases outpace inflation.

“Our findings suggest that the elimination of the Medicaid rebate cap had unintended consequences for children with asthma,” Chua said.

Chua notes that other brand drugs have also triggered the rebate cap, including medications for diabetes and infections.

“If other brand name drugs are withdrawn due to elimination of the rebate cap, policymakers should proactively implement interventions to prevent therapy disruptions, such as ensuring insurer coverage of alternative drugs,” he said.