Organisms with hard, durable parts, like shells, are more likely to be preserved as fossils than organisms composed entirely of soft tissue.
News — Biologists endeavoring to protect and revive barren habitats face constraints due to their limited understanding of the original state of those environments prior to human intervention. This holds particularly true for coastal ecosystems, a significant number of which had already undergone severe transformations caused by pollution and excessive exploitation centuries prior to scientific observation.
A recent study published in the journal PeerJ reveals an intriguing finding: a precise replica of present-day marine ecosystems exists right beneath the surface. Drawing upon over two decades of research in conservation paleobiology, the study indicates that fossils belonging to diverse marine groups, such as worms, mollusks, crabs, and sea urchins, are remarkably preserved in proportion to their ecological abundance.
Michal Kowalewski, the Thompson Chair of Invertebrate Paleontology at the Florida Museum and co-author of the study, commented, "This has been a longstanding subject in paleontology for decades. Researchers have examined modern ecosystems across various habitats to assess the fidelity of the fossil record in capturing the living communities. However, previous studies primarily focused on how individual species are documented within a particular group. Our objective was to understand how entire ecological groups are documented within the entire ecosystem."
Fossils serve as an incomplete and flawed documentation of Earth's history. Organisms composed mainly of soft tissue face a lower chance of preservation compared to those possessing sturdy and decay-resistant structures like bones and shells. Furthermore, the durability and thickness of these hard parts vary depending on the organism's species and developmental stage, impacting their likelihood of being conserved as fossils.
To overcome this challenge, scientists have employed mollusks as a reliable indicator for assessing the well-being of ecosystems as a whole. Mollusks have a significant presence in the fossil record, and previous studies have established their effectiveness in reflecting past levels of diversity. Recently, European researchers utilized fossils and historical data to demonstrate a significant decline in native mollusk biodiversity in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, primarily attributed to global warming. This discovery strongly suggests that other marine groups within the region are likely approaching comparable thresholds of decline.
Similar to how a doctor assesses a patient's vital signs, scientists can utilize fossil mollusks to gain a general understanding of the well-being and stability of an environment. However, in order to delve into specific patterns such as population declines, range shifts, and the impact of invasive species, a comprehensive examination is necessary. This thorough evaluation allows scientists to acquire a more detailed understanding of the complex dynamics and changes occurring within ecosystems.
Lead author Carrie Tyler, an assistant professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, stated, "The majority of our knowledge regarding biases in the fossil record stems from research focused on mollusks. In our study, we aimed to investigate whether these biases remain consistent when considering a wide range of organisms, not solely mollusks. We sought to understand the implications when examining various groups such as worms, sea urchins, and other constituents of marine ecosystems." By incorporating multiple organism types, the study aimed to uncover a more comprehensive understanding of the potential biases present in the fossil record.
Prior to reaching their conclusion, Tyler and Kowalewski faced the initial challenge of locating an appropriate marine ecosystem where they could compare the composition of living and fossil organisms and analyze the disparities between past and present communities. This step was crucial in their research as it allowed them to investigate and understand the differences between the historical and contemporary ecological makeup.
After careful consideration, the authors identified an environment off the coast of North Carolina that was relatively untouched and served as a suitable site for their research. This particular location exhibited a combination of living organisms and preserved skeletal remains. In order to conduct their study, the researchers gathered samples from 52 different locations, following transects that spanned from the coastal waters close to the shore to the open sea. This comprehensive sampling strategy allowed them to collect data across a range of habitats and depths within the marine ecosystem.
Kowalewski explained that the chosen system was ideal due to its diverse range of habitats spanning from estuary to open shelf, covering the onshore-offshore gradient. Each of these habitats harbored distinct and specialized communities. This selection allowed Tyler and Kowalewski to assess the preservation potential of various organisms and examine how different environmental conditions influence fossilization. By investigating a wide range of organisms in different habitats, they could gain valuable insights into the preservation biases and patterns across the ecosystem.
Over a span of two years, Tyler and Kowalewski meticulously tallied more than 60,000 specimens, encompassing both living and deceased organisms, which encompassed a diverse array of marine invertebrates. As anticipated, the robust shells of mollusks contributed to an elevated presence of their remains in the fossil record in comparison to other organism groups. However, the researchers made an intriguing discovery: fragments of deceased corals, sand dollars, tube-forming worms, and other non-mollusk organisms were broadly represented at a similar level of abundance and diversity as their living counterparts. This finding suggests that the fossil record can effectively capture the composition of these non-mollusk groups, contrary to previous assumptions.
Certain groups, such as sea stars and brachiopods, which displayed limited diversity in the studied region, were not recovered from the fossil record. This absence could be attributed, at least partially, to their low population numbers. Additionally, the researchers noted that past and present habitats often hosted distinct species compositions. For instance, a prevalent species of hermit crab observed in present-day habitats did not appear in the fossil record. However, despite these variations, the overall number of species within different groups remained relatively consistent throughout time.
The majority of marine ecosystems do not possess a comprehensive inventory of their species, and the current roster is continuously diminishing as certain species experience declines in population and others face extinction. However, if other marine ecosystems demonstrate a similar level of preservation fidelity as observed in the North Carolina study, researchers will have a valuable benchmark for assessing the long-term sustainability of these communities. The archived fossil records provide a vital resource that can be used to evaluate the historical composition and dynamics of marine ecosystems, enabling a deeper understanding of their resilience and potential future trajectories.
Tyler highlights the significance of utilizing the entire fossil assemblage as a window into the past state of a specific location, despite variations in preservation among different animal groups. By comparing the fossil record with the present-day living community, researchers can discern the extent of changes that have occurred within an ecosystem over time. This knowledge can inform conservation efforts by guiding the development of appropriate strategies based on a comprehensive understanding of ecosystem transformations. By leveraging the information provided by the fossil record, scientists can make informed decisions to promote effective conservation and restoration measures.
RSS