In an article published in the fall issue of the MIT Sloan Management Review, the leading outlet for practice-relevant advances in management and technology, a Georgia Institute of Technology professor offers a roadmap for companies looking to team up without taking a wrong turn.
鈥淭oo often firms, especially small ones, rush into an alliance haphazardly without asking key questions about which partners make the most sense, how an alliance should be structured, and what is the exit strategy for when an alliance is no longer productive,鈥� said Frank Rothaermel, the Russell and Nancy McDonough Chair of Business and professor of Strategy and Innovation in the Scheller College of Business. The article is co-authored with Ha Hoang, a professor of management at ESSEC Business School in France.
Rothaermel has spent years examining thousands of research and development alliances forged between firms in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other industries to understand what makes those partnerships work. Time after time, it came down to several key steps.
First and foremost: Picking the right partner. Before rushing to join forces, companies should take a step back and ask, 鈥楢re we right for each other?鈥�
鈥淢anagers shouldn鈥檛 assume that the partnership will be beneficial based on a loose understanding of the other firm鈥檚 goals and experience,鈥� Rothaermel said.
Potential alliance partners should be evaluated based on whether they contribute strategic value and complement the firm鈥檚 existing portfolio of partnerships, Rothaermel wrote in the article.
The authors highlighted partnerships Tesla Motors Inc. forged with automakers Daimler AG and Toyota Motor Corp. to help bring its electric cars to market. While Daimler helped Tesla with a cash investment and engineering expertise, Toyota provided the electric car maker with access to an automobile manufacturing plant. More recently, Tesla added a partnership with Panasonic to their portfolio to build the Gigafactory to produce lithium-ion batteries.
When negotiating the terms of a new partnership, larger companies would be wise not to rush to leverage their size to achieve an unfair deal for the smaller company.
鈥淣egotiators who focus on capturing the lion鈥檚 share of the potential value at the expense of their partner run the risk of undermining the alliance and seeing little in actual gains,鈥� the professors wrote.
Other steps are also essential, such as ensuring all partners stay on the same page operationally in a bid to head off potential problems. Another crucial part of the process: knowing when and how to call it quits.
鈥淥ne executive we interviewed admitted that the lack of an exit plan left his company at a loss for what to do when a larger partner terminated their four-year partnership,鈥� the professors wrote.
And finally, diversify. Just like an investment portfolio, rather than relying on one key partnership, build alliances with multiple firms to lessen the impact if one partner jumps ship.
For a more in-depth look at these strategies, see the full article at MIT Sloan Management Review鈥檚 website, .
RSS