麻豆传媒

But a new study by Arizona State University shows the opposite may be true 鈥� that one psychological effect of population density is for those people to adopt a 鈥渟low life strategy.鈥� This strategy focuses more on planning for the long-term future and includes tactics like preferring long-term romantic relationships, having fewer children and investing more in education.

The study, 鈥淭he crowded life is a slow life: Population density and life history strategy,鈥� was published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Its findings provide novel insights into how population density affects human psychology, and has implications for thinking about population growth, environmental influences on social behavior, and human cultural diversity.

鈥淥ur findings are contrary to the notion that crowded places are chaotic and socially problematic,鈥� said Oliver Sng, who led the research while a doctoral student at ASU and who now is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Michigan. 鈥淧eople who live in dense places seem to plan for the future more, prefer long-term romantic relationships, get married later in life, have fewer children and invest a lot in each child. They generally adopt an approach to life that values quality over quantity.鈥�

Sng, with ASU Foundation Professor Steven Neuberg and ASU psychology professors Douglas Kenrick and Michael Varnum, used data from nations around the world and the 50 U.S. states to show that population density naturally correlates with these slow life strategies. Then, in a series of experiments (e.g., in which people read about increasing crowdedness or heard sounds of a crowded environment), they found that perceptions of crowdedness cause people to delay gratification and prefer slower, more long-term, mating and parenting behaviors.

Why? Using evolutionary life history theory, Neuberg notes that different strategies are useful in different kinds of environments.

鈥淚n environments where population density is low, and there is thus relatively little competition for available resources, there are few costs but lots of advantages to adopting a 鈥榝ast鈥� strategy,鈥� he suggested. 鈥淥n the other hand, when the environment gets crowded, individuals have to compete vigorously with others for the available resources and territory.鈥�

鈥淭o be successful in this competition, they need to invest more in building up their own abilities, which tends to delay having children,鈥� he added. 鈥淏ecause this greater social competition also affects their kids, they tend to focus more of their time and energy on enhancing their abilities and competitiveness. So a slow strategy鈥攊n which one focuses more on the future and invests in quality over quantity鈥攖ends to enhance the reproductive success of individuals in high density environments.鈥�

Will higher densities always lead to this slow strategy? 鈥淣ot at all,鈥� said Sng. 鈥淚n fact, when high densities are paired with unpredictable death or disease, the theory predicts that people will become more present-focused and opportunistic.鈥�

Sng added that the 鈥渟low life strategy, when brought to its extremes, also has its own pitfalls. Consider, for example, the pre-school craze in dense places like New York City, where parents are obsessed with getting their children into the best pre-schools. There are similar phenomenon emerging in dense countries like Japan and Singapore.鈥�

鈥淲ith the world鈥檚 population growing,鈥� Neuberg added, 鈥渋t seems more important than ever to understand the psychological effects of overcrowding and how living in crowded environments might influence people鈥檚 behaviors. Applying a new perspective to an old question is allowing us to reexamine the effects of living in crowded environments.鈥�

The research was partially supported by the Arizona State University Foundation for a New American University.

####