麻豆传媒

News — GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (July 17, 2024) — scientists have identified more than 1,000 previously undetected proteins in common metabolite samples, which persist despite extraction methods designed to weed them out.  

The findings, , give scientists new insights and tools for improving future metabolomics experiments, including a novel protocol for removing these proteins during the extraction process. The study does not invalidate prior results but instead reinforces the importance of appropriate controls and validation in experimental design and analysis.

“Scientific advances often happen through a combination of chance and keen observation. In this case, we noticed a strange result during an experiment, dug into it and found this vast landscape of proteins that were slipping by standard metabolite extractions,” said Ryan Sheldon, Ph.D., director of VAI’s and corresponding author of the study. “These proteins can obscure results and potentially contribute to false positives and negatives. We hope our findings will raise awareness of these proteomic stowaways and further strengthen the metabolomics field.”

It has long been assumed that the chemicals used to extract metabolites destroy proteins present in samples, thus preventing them from interfering with the final analysis. The study demonstrates that some proteins endure, which may shift the desired phenotype of the extracted sample and alter results.  

To screen out these potentially problematic proteins, Sheldon and colleagues added a filtration step to their standard extraction process that removes proteins larger than 3 kilodaltons — a threshold that encompasses most proteins.

“At the end of the day, we can have the best instrumentation in the world but if there are issues with sample preparation, then the technology can only take us so far,” Sheldon said. “Ensuring that our phenotypes are free of any confounding proteins is critical to attaining accurate results. Our findings help us do just that.”

The study was spearheaded by VAI Mass Spectrometry Core Research Scientist Molly Hopper, Ph.D., and then- student Rae House, Ph.D. House is now a -supported postdoctoral fellow in the lab of , at VAI.

Other authors include Michael P. Vincent, Ph.D., Abigail E. Ellis, Colt D. Capan, M.S., Zachary B. Madaj, M.S., Emily Wolfrum, MPH, Christine N. Isaguirre, Carlos D. Castello, Amy B. Johnson, Martha L. Escobar-Galvis, Ph.D., Kelsey S. Williams, Ph.D., and Hyoungjoo Lee, Ph.D., of Van Andel Institute.

Research reported in this publication was supported by Van Andel Institute’s Core Technologies and Services (Mass Spectrometry Core and Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Core); Van Andel Institute’s Metabolism and Nutrition (MeNu) Program; and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award no. T32CA251066 (P. Jones).  The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

###

ABOUT VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE Van Andel Institute (VAI) is committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations through cutting edge biomedical research and innovative educational offerings. Established in Grand Rapids, Michigan, in 1996 by the Van Andel family, VAI is now home to more than 500 scientists, educators and support staff, who work with a growing number of national and international collaborators to foster discovery. The Institute’s scientists study the origins of cancer, Parkinson’s and other diseases and translate their findings into breakthrough prevention and treatment strategies. Our educators develop inquiry-based approaches for K–12 education to help students and teachers prepare the next generation of problem-solvers, while our Graduate School offers a rigorous, research-intensive Ph.D. program in molecular and cellular biology. Learn more at .